Why Don’t States Switch Sides Anymore? The Rise and Fall of American Electoral Volatility
نویسندگان
چکیده
American electoral volatility is in a free fall. Overtime variation in the partisan balance of presidential elections across states has matched an all-time low in American history and is a fraction of its 1970’s peak. The current decline in volatility parallels declines during the Gilded Age and Franklin Roosevelt’s presidency. Trends in electoral volatility vary regionally, and the South’s patterns of electoral volatility are distinctive. This paper develops a theory of electoral volatility at the voter level based on the premise that volatility is due to voter uncertainty. Party polarization makes the parties’ positions distinct and reduces volatility. Close elections increase incentives for voters to become informed and for campaigns to inform voters, which reduce voter uncertainty. Increased voter turnout and a larger number of votes cast per state also decrease volatility. The model is empirically validated using both historical aggregate data from 1832 to 2012 and American National Election Studies (ANES) data at the voter level from 1952 to 2012.
منابع مشابه
The Rise and Fall of the Israeli-Palestinian Peace Process
This article examines the rise and fall of the Peace Process and questions the reason for which the United States of America was successful in bringing the two sides to the negotiating table during the 1990s. It investigates the reason for which the process ultimately failed, as well as the reason for which Washingtonwas unsuccessful in restarting the peace process in the past decade. It is arg...
متن کاملKurdish Movements and Distributive Power Structures: A Theoretical Model to Understand the Rise and Fall of Kurdish Movements
Many studies have been conducted on the Kurds and their movements. Most authors have considered historical dimensions or applied limited theoretical variables, but have not been able to identify the variables to identify the key reasons behind the rise and fall of Kurdish movements in an explanatory theoretical model. Consequently, there is neither available data about their rise, continuity, a...
متن کاملworking paper 403 March 2015 THE ELECTORAL BASIS OF IDEOLOGICAL POLARIZATION IN LATIN AMERICA JUAN ANDRÉS MORAES
Polarization has been always identified as a problem for Latin American democracies. Yet its determinants remain largely undertheorized and without systematic evidence. This paper tackles this shortcoming with a new explanation where polarization is conceptualized as a mobilizational tool used by parties to deliver unequivocal signals to voters about their location in the policy space. The expl...
متن کاملOn Why the United States Should Not Attack Iran: A Conservative, Evangelical Christian Response
In the midst of American intervention in Afghanistan and Iraq, and in the aftermath of the presidential election in Iran, support for American involvement in Iran has increased in some circles. In this piece, our desire is to give a conservative, evangelical Christian response to why America should not support any military action against Iran. A position advocated by many of us is “Just War.” I...
متن کاملA Qualitative Content Analysis of US Foreign Policy towards Cuba during Barack Obama’s Administration: Hegemony or Leadership?
The United States’ relations with Cuba are rooted in the US intervention in the process of Cuba’s independence from Spain in the 1890s. The US preserved its interest-based approach towards Cuba during the first half of the 20th century, which culminated in the Cuba’s counter-hegemonic revolution in 1959. This revolution led to more than fifty years of hostility between two countries, which took...
متن کامل